First, "Hand foot and mouth disease" then "SARS" then the common cold and now this. This is called "Agenda setting" in which the media drums up the importance of the flu pandemic, which in my opinion, is blown up a little bit too big. If you thought that only the newspapers are responsible for fanning flames of the paranoia, I would gladly direct you attention over to many bus stops in
Anyone notice a pattern forming? Flu pandemic leads to increase attention paid to hygiene. To further help in the overall "hygiene campaign" and to bank on the increasing number of people growing paranoid about hygiene, the media drums it up further. But wait, a more sinister reason why the media might want to drum up the paranoia about germs is because they are paid to do so. Their sponsors, in the form of the advertisers of said sanitation and anti bacterial products would stand to gain if more people grew paranoid and bought more of their products. It is a cycle of conspiracy here!
The topic of "germs" is quite an unobtrusive one. Who has actually had first hand experience of getting a swab sample from a door knob and isolating the micro-organisms in a laboratory aside from biology students? And with the stringent control of laboratory equipment in various tertiary institutions, one is not allowed to use the equipment to "satisfy curiosity" only to do what the lesson for the day requires of you. Hence, very few people actually have first hand experience dealing with the actual number of germs found on a door knob. Most of the information about how unhygienic a door knob or a sand pit is comes from top scientists only anyway, hence people will believe anything the "experts” say.
Those of us who lived long enough would know that this growing over blown obsession with hygiene was not present back in the "good old days". Today, you get the impression that a child would die of infection if he were to as much as crawl through a puddle. Back then, children played in drains and wallowed in swamp lands yet they were just as healthy as children nowadays. In fact, based on basic biology alone, exposure to germs is required for the body to build its own immune system. We can thus see that this germ paranoia was cultivated indirectly, and was cumulative over time.
Now the conspiracy comes full circle. The media messages, funded by their sponsors, make people paranoid about hygiene. This increases sales of the products the sponsors are selling. The over reliance on those disinfectants and anti bacterial liquids will, in theory, indirectly create a generation of children with a weaker immunity system. Sooner or later, this new generation will become dependent on the anti bacterial products thus ensuring an enduring clientele for the marketers of the products. The media companies benefit, and so do their sponsors.
Get down with the sickness ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the new age of paranoia.
Yes I agree with what you say.
ReplyDeletePeople nowadays have becom more hygienic. The improvements in the standard of living in Singapore play a very significant role in this hygiene trend. In my parents' generation, drinking water from wells were a common sight. Rain, wind, dust, some soil and even fallen leaves from trees all go into the well water, but they drank those water without much purifying process and they turned out fine. They were poorer and water was precious to them. However, in these days, we cannot tolerate even just a little dirt on the cup; we pour our drink away and get another one because we can afford to do so.
Overtime, our luxurious life make us weaker people. For example, when i go overseas to countries like thailand and taiwan, which are famous for their roadside food stalls, I am extremely tempted but hesistant to try the local dishes for fear that it would upset my stomach and disrupt the rest of my journey. But the locals can eat them and still be fine.
Maybe it could be psychologically affected. Remember the phrase "Ignorance is bliss". When one does not know that, for example, eating less hygienic food would cause an upset stomach, they would have no fear of doing so. Having eaten unhygienic food, their body would naturally develop an immunity to whatever bacteria are present in the food. After getting diarrhea a couple of times, the person who ate unhygienic food would no longer suffer from any sickness from that food due to his developed immunity.
ReplyDeleteYes i do agree. Just looking at the poster of the infiltration of germs on a hand is enough to make me paranoid and avoid touching any surfaces. The media does influence the mass on certain issues.
ReplyDeleteI feel that from an advertisers point of view, the current H1N1 virus is a good reason to boost their sales and they are banking on it. This might not be all that bad if you are an advertiser.
At the same time, i feel that paranoia injected by the media in the case of H1N1 virus should not always be viewed negatively. People do tend to forget to keep their hands clean or sneeze into a tissue. The constant reminders by the media helps people practise cleanliness.
As mentioned by Samuel, gone were the carefree days of wallowing in the sand and playing in the rain. The danger of deadly viruses are to blame.
As what you have discussed in your blog post. we can see how the 'Pandamic' that occured from the outbreak of H1N1 is not all bad news for everyone. Yes, suddenly we all become paranoid when someone sneeze. I love how you phrased it; "like as if you were the leaper of the new century".
ReplyDeleteWe all have the media to thank for that. When it was at its peak, channel NewsAsia was covering it sooooo extensively. At one point of time i was going 'OH ENOUGH ABOUT THE FLU ALREADY'. They were reporting like the various figures of infected people all across the globe, OVER AND OVER again. its a totally agenda setting function if you ask me.
Do you realise how they make a big issue about the newest death from H1N1? One more death reported in singapore and it gets the front page and a two page special report after that. However, when it comes to reporting about the people who have recovered from H1N1, there is hardly any coverage. Maybe a column or two, but that is it.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading this, I am beginning to suspect that such a pattern is done on purpose. Many people have gotten infected from H1N1 but have recovered and lived to tell the tale. Instead of instilling paranoia among the population by covering the deaths, why not instill HOPE by giving more coverage to the recoveries?
Yes i realised that. I also realised that recently H1N1 covereage has been tuned down in favour of covering other news worthy events like the death of Michael Jackson. Instead of instilling hope by publishing news of H1N1 victims' recoveries, they try to divert the attention of the public to other issues.
ReplyDeleteI think bad news tends to sell better than good news. Fear is a stronger emotion than happiness.
It's interesting you call it a conspiracy. I rather call it public education. Much as we sometimes distrust the papers, because it is so easily a tool for agenda-setting in the bad sense, I think our papers are in fact doing a good job filing those daily news about H1N1 and the measures taken to prevent or contain the spread of the virus here. I would choose to see the other players - adverts, posters, public signages or sponsors as helping to increase awareness and promote socially responsible behaviours, in the aspect of practising good personal hygiene, for the common good of everyone in the community. Such behaviours often times need to be cultivated, pushed or reminded as individuals tend to be self-centred and care only for himself or herself. When it comes to a potentially serious disease outbreak that can threaten lives, it's always better to over-react like the way the authorities and newspapers were handling the H1N1 situation, than to do otherwise and be sorry about it.
ReplyDeleteWell, I personally feel that if these ads are considered as a form of public eductaion, then they would really be what we call 'untimely'. we don't have to go to such extents after a pandemic has broken out. If it was really in the complete name of public education, then why not broadcast before the pandemic broke out?
ReplyDeleteThen and again I would find it rather extremistic to deem these acts as a form of outright 'psychological-paranoia-manipulation' or a form of beaucratic consipracy. Indeed, the sponsers of these advertisments were commercial companies, but looking at the posters and news- they are propagating a message of hygene awareness and mantainence. Ultimately, we have to admit that the message is still 'for the people'.
Well, of course the only way to know is to ask the people themselves, but even if we were to approach them, I guess even they will say that its education;
And then we doubt their agendas, and a new paranoia would emerge.
Anyway, should we be affected by these news and posters? Evidently our general population is not too bothered with this H1N1 outbreak. While schools and camps reinforce their efforts to contain this pandemic to a 'pseudo-apocalyptic' case scenario, the general public still has yet to cringe or outcast the next person who choughs or sneezes in the MRT or at crowded areas. Neither is there a mad rush for Dettol or N95 masks.
The paranoia is from within, my good men. There is no 'should-be' except how we make out and interpret the facts that are presented to us; With or without this H1N1 virus.
You'll be surprised, they do cringe when I sneeze on the MRT. Some even very visibly move away.
ReplyDeleteThe thing about H1N1 being able to "threaten lives" has been proven otherwise by the massive amount of people who recover from the virus. I know they adopt the whole "preparing for the worse" mindset, but honestly H1N1 was never as fatal as SARS was, the number of deaths was no where near SARS. Yet the amount of coverage on H1N1 was about equal and the security measures were a lot more stringent.
Indeed, well evidently much of our youths are not affected by the news then (it was reported on the news). As for the disease itself, the mortailty rate of H1N1 is really low- it stands at an average of 6.7 out of 1000 cases. In comparison, common flu has a mortaily rate of about 5. I would like to see how people cringe at flu like there is going to be no more tomorrow for Singapore.
ReplyDeleteAs we approached the new millennium some 9 years ago, the IT experts proclaimed messages of doom: "prepare for the worse but hope for the best" they would say. IT businesses skyrocketed that year.
ReplyDeleteThen in 2003, with the arrival of SARs into Singapore, the messengers of doom again proclaimed “prepare for the worse but hope for the best”. Makers of masks (especially the N95), vitamins and flu medications made whopping profits that year.
The same “prepare for the worse but hope for the best” message can be echoed everywhere one turns. H1N1 has not been spared.
The question really is: Are businesses amplifying the doom message in order to profiteer from unfortunate events? Or are doom messages necessary as wake up calls, fueling inventers’ and innovators’ mind to create a better life?
Whatever it is, I agree that bad news sells papers; however it also builds businesses and propels thinkers. So maybe, bad news really isn’t that bad after all?
Totally agreed. Unless they are trying to say that we Singaporeans do not possess personal hygiene in the first place! Granted there would be inconsiderate people who refuse to rest at home and insist on trawling the mall while wheezing and sneezing away. Then there are those who spit phlegm or whatever for unsuspecting victims to step on. And the number of people who actually cough in your face on the crowded MRT or bus, without covering their faces, mind you! Perhaps these are the people whom the campaign are targeting at and rightly so.
ReplyDeleteThis is all MEDIA AGENDA guys! Don't you see? It is really obvious and extremely real to see the media cover issues during a certain period of time. Like i wrote on my com 101 blog, the example of the Iran protests.. When it first started, the media covered issues relating to how the protesters formed social relations online through Twitter and gradually the focus changed to violence of the protest: the real deal. H1N1 issues covered in the media simply reflect the media's agenda.
ReplyDelete